One issue still feels like it will get more attention in the days and weeks to come: the role of the pastor. We don’t have a pastor now. Even when we were in our six-week trial last fall, the pastors only came in to teach and bless the communion elements. They weren’t really leaders or shepherds or members of our community. It felt, to them and to us, like they were hired guns.
Now that we’re moving forward in a new place, we’re trying to figure our what we need. First, we need someone to teach us. I think we’re fundamentally Presbyterian enough to want that person to be well educated in scripture and theology. But we’re really wrestling with what else we want that person to be. Do they need to be charismatic and winsome, to bring people in? Do they need to “lead” us, organizationally and spiritually?
I personally think we’re trying to create a new (or rediscover an old) model of what a pastor should be. In the modern megachurch the pastor has become superhero: charismatic speaker, effective manager, personal counselor, shining example of faith, and flawless example of humanity. Of course, no person not named Jesus Christ could be all those things, which means unrealistic expectations, unmet needs, and incredible pressure on the pastor. It seems unhealthy all the way around. My sense is that the emerging church will want pastors who are fellow travelers, fellow strugglers, fellow saints. Our pastors will have gifts, just like the people in the church have gifts, and they’ll share those gifts freely.
Beyond that, my crystal ball becomes cloudy. Will there be full-time clergy, or just tent makers, or both? Will preachers be seminary-trained, or just wise folks who are called by the community to teach, or some combination? How will we treat people gifted in preaching differently than people gifted in accounting or video production or music? I think we have much to learn and discover.